19/04/2024

Update on Sudan: Now that money's been pledged for aid, what people really need...

 

My latest on Sudan for RFI English, a year after the start of the war, and the growing needs of Sudanese people & refugees, with UNDP's representative in Sudan, Abdallah Dardari and Isabelle Coleman of USAID:


'Why aid isn't a lasting solution for millions facing famine in war-torn Sudan'






After a year of war, millions of people in Sudan are facing displacement, violence and hunger. While the world has pledged billions in aid, the United Nations says the crisis can only be solved if Sudanese people are given the means to rebuild and produce their own food again.


By Melissa Chemam with RFI

Internally displaced people and refugees are impacting the already fragile economies of Sudan and its neighbours.

conference in Paris on Monday raised more than €2 billion in international pledges that come one year after the start of fighting between the Sudanese army and paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF).

It's a conflict that has forced millions to flee and brought the population to the brink of famine. 

Donor countries at the Paris event recognise the seriousness of Sudan's crisis and are genuine in their desire to take meaningful action, the UN Development Programme (UNDP)'s Abdallah Al Dardari, told RFI.

They know the situation in Sudan will spillover and affect the entire region.

"Investing in Sudan is actually a global public good. There is finally a sense of urgency on the issue," Al Dardari said.

Urgent need for agriculture

But emergency handouts will not offer a lasting solution. The UN needs to revive agriculture in Sudan and to bring back food production, jobs and incomes.

"Forty percent of farmers in Sudan this year could not plant their seeds," Al Dardari said, adding that food security was a major obstacle.

"There will not be a harvest next year, which means this is very serious."

UNDP figures, meanwhile, show that 50 percent of salaried employees in Sudan have lost their incomes.

Even if there was food available, half of the population would lack the money to buy it.

"What we are suggesting is a comprehensive approach that takes into consideration the immediate humanitarian needs but also [the need] to bring back livelihoods," Al Dardari said.

The logic is that investing in livelihoods will in turn reduce reliance on aid, and much of Sudan stands to benefit from the right sorts of investment.

"If we produce food in Sudan today, and if we invest in local infrastructure, bring back the microfinance markets and allow farmers to buy their inputs and so on – in areas where safety and security allow for that – it will reduce the humanitarian burden," Al Dardari said.

It would also signal to Sudanese that they aren't merely seen as victims of a human catastrophe, but as people with agency and with active voices.

International pressure

When fighting broke out on 15 April, 2023, most diplomats and aid workers left Sudan – effectively ceasing to serve those most vulnerable. 

With the country on the brink of famine, the UN says it has been able to reach only 10 percent of Sudan's 48 million people.

Those still working on the ground already see "children dying of malnutrition every day", said Isobel Coleman of USAID, the United States' international development agency.

The international community has a role to play in stopping the fighting, she told RFI after attending the conference this week. 

Conflicting parties must be brought back to the negotiating table, Coleman said, adding that a ceasefire would allow for full humanitarian aid access and avert an even more serious crisis. 

"The sooner the better, because the suffering is immense. Most parts of the country are on the verge of famine," she said.

The US is considering further sanctions against Sudanese commanders and hopes that other countries will do the same, according to Coleman. 

She said she was optimistic about the reopening of peace talks, which are expected to resume in Saudi Arabia.

"We don't yet have a precise date, but I hope that we will know soon so we can bring all the parties involved in this crisis around the table.

"This is the only way to move forward."

-



NEW PODCAST EPISODE: Spotlight on Africa

 

Episode 2 is out!


Image carrée
SPOTLIGHT ON AFRICA


After Senegal's success, can Mali and Niger also hope for elections?


Issued on: 




The delayed March presidential vote in Senegal confirmed the country remains a beacon of democracy in a region facing increasing instability. RFI looks at how the peaceful victory of Bassirou Diomaye Faye and mentor Ousmane Sonko stands to influence the politics of neighbouring Sahel nations.

This edition of Spotlight on Africa looks at the vast and diverse West Africa region, from Senegal to Benin to Niger and Mali.

It's a big election year for Africa in general, with no fewer than 16 countries heading to the polls.

These include a complicated parliamentary vote in Togo on 19 April, general elections on South Africa on 29 May, presidential elections in Algeria in September, and presidential elections in Ghana in December.

But for Sahel nations Mali, Niger and Burkina Faso, elections appear a distant dream as the military juntas in power delay processes for a return to civilian rule.

Many hope the inspiring outcome of the Senegalese election can galvanise the region.

Speaking to RFI about the polls are former Senegalese diplomat Babacar Ndiaye and Nigerien researcher Seidik Abba.

Meanwhile Yvonne Ndege, of the International Organisation for Migration, looks at the issue of migration on the continent.

And finally Azu Nwagbogu, curator of the Benin pavilion for the Venice Biennale, speaks to RFI's Ollia Horton ahead of the event's opening on Saturday.

Read also:



Episode mixed by Erwan Rome.

Spotlight on Africa is a podcast from Radio France Internationale. 


-


Update on UNRWA

 



STATEMENT BY THE COMMISSIONER-GENERAL OF UNRWA TO THE SECURITY COUNCIL

The Commissioner-General of UNRWA delivers his speech to members of the Security Council on the unprecedented humanitarian crisis in Gaza and the unprecedented threats and challenges facing the agency
The Commissioner-General of UNRWA delivers his speech to members of the Security Council on the unprecedented humanitarian crisis in Gaza and the unprecedented threats and challenges facing the agency


17 April 2024, New York


Mr. President,

Members of the Council,

This is a time of seismic change in the Middle East.

At the heart of this region, the United Nations Agency for Palestine Refugees – UNRWA – is a stabilizing force.

In Gaza, the Agency is the backbone of the humanitarian operation, coordinating and providing lifesaving assistance.

Beyond Gaza, it has championed human development for Palestine Refugees for decades across the region.

Today, an insidious campaign to end UNRWA’s operations is underway, with serious implications for international peace and security.

It is in this context that the Council is asked to consider the existential challenges confronting the Agency.  

Mr. President,

Six months of relentless bombardment and a merciless siege have transformed Gaza beyond recognition.

Homes, schools, and hospitals have been reduced to rubble, under which countless bodies lie.

Children are bearing the brunt of this war.

More than 17,000 are separated from their families, left to face the horror of Gaza alone.

Children are killed, injured, and starved – deprived of any physical or psychological safety.

Across Gaza, a man-made famine is tightening its grip.

In the north, infants and young children have begun to die of malnutrition and dehydration.

Across the border, food and clean water wait. 

But UNRWA is denied permission to deliver this aid and save lives.

This outrage is occurring despite consecutive orders by the International Court of Justice to increase the flow of aid into Gaza – which can be done if there is sufficient political will.

You have the power to make the difference.

Members of the Council,  

UNRWA’s mandate is supported by an overwhelming majority of Member States.

Yet, the Agency is under enormous strain.

It is facing a campaign to push it out of the occupied Palestinian territory.

In Gaza, the government of Israel seeks to end UNRWA’s activities.

The Agency’s requests to deliver aid to the north are repeatedly denied.

Our staff are barred from coordination meetings between Israel and humanitarian actors.

Worse, UNRWA premises and staff have been targeted since the beginning of the war.

178 UNRWA personnel have been killed.

More than 160 UNWRA premises, mostly used as shelters, have been damaged or destroyed, killing more than 400 people.

Premises vacated by the Agency have been used for military purposes, by Israeli forces, Hamas, and other Palestinian armed groups.

Our Headquarters has been occupied militarily, and allegations have emerged concerning the existence of tunnels under our premises.

UNRWA personnel detained by Israeli security forces have shared harrowing accounts of mistreatment and torture in detention.

Mr. President,

We demand an independent investigation and accountability for the blatant disregard for the protected status of humanitarian workers, operations, and facilities under international law.

To do otherwise would set a dangerous precedent and compromise humanitarian work around the world. 

Members of the Council,

The situation in the occupied West Bank is also highly concerning.

Daily attacks by Israeli settlers, military incursions, and the destruction of homes and civilian infrastructure are part of a well-oiled system of segregation and oppression.

UNRWA’s operational space is shrinking, with arbitrary measures imposed by Israel to restrict the presence and movement of staff.

It is becoming increasingly difficult to keep our schools and health centers open and accessible.

Legislative and administrative actions to evict UNRWA from its headquarters in East Jerusalem and prohibit its activity on Israeli territory are also underway.

Mr. President,

Amid these challenges, serious allegations against individual UNRWA personnel in Gaza emerged in January.

Horrified by these allegations, I immediately terminated the appointments of those concerned.

The Secretary General ordered an investigation through the Office of Internal Oversight Services.  

In parallel, an Independent Review Group is assessing how UNRWA upholds neutrality - a core principle guiding our work.

Despite these prompt and decisive actions, a significant amount of donor funding remains suspended.

This has serious operational implications and undermines the financial sustainability of the Agency.

Be assured that we remain firmly committed to implementing the recommendations of the review and to strengthening existing safeguards against neutrality breaches.

Members of the Council,

As I informed the General Assembly in March, calls for UNRWA’s closure are not about adherence to humanitarian principles.

These calls are about ending the refugee status of millions of Palestinians.

They seek to change the long-standing political parameters for peace in the occupied Palestinian territory set by the resolutions of the General Assembly and this Council. 

Accusations that UNRWA deliberately perpetuates refugee status are false and dishonest.

The Agency exists because a political solution does not.

It exists in lieu of a State that can deliver critical public services.

The international community has long attempted to contain, rather than resolve, the Israel-Palestine conflict.

Lip-service is paid to the two-state solution each time an escalation occurs, costing lives and hope.

UNRWA was created 75 years ago as a temporary agency.

A stop-gap measure, pending a political answer to the question of Palestine.

If the international community truly commits to a political solution, UNRWA can retrieve its temporary nature by supporting a time-bound transition, delivering education, primary healthcare, and social support.

It can do so until a Palestinian administration takes over these services, absorbing UNRWA’s Palestinian personnel as civil servants.

Mr. President,

Dismantling UNRWA will have lasting repercussions.

In the short-term, it will deepen the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and accelerate the onset of famine.

In the longer-term, it will jeopardize the transition from ceasefire to ‘day after’ by depriving a traumatized population of essential services.

It will make nearly impossible the formidable task of bringing half a million deeply distressed girls and boys back to learning.

Failing to deliver on education will condemn an entire generation to despair – fueling anger, resentment, and endless cycles of violence.

A political solution cannot succeed in such a scenario.

Members of the Council,

Let me conclude with three appeals:

First, I call on Council Members to act in accordance with General Assembly Resolution 302 and safeguard UNRWA’s critical role both now and within the framework of a transition.

UNRWA has long been a custodian of the rights of Palestine Refugees.

It can only relinquish its central role of providing critical services and protecting human rights when a political solution is realized.

Until then, the political support of Member States must be matched by funding.

Second, I urge you to commit to a genuine political process culminating in a solution that can bring peace to Palestinians and Israelis.

This process must uphold Palestine Refugees’ rights and aspiration to a just and lasting political solution to their plight.

Third, we must acknowledge that a political process alone will not guarantee a sustainable peace.

The wounds that run deep in this region cannot be healed without cultivating empathy and rejecting the dehumanization that is rampant, whether in political rhetoric or in the misuse of new technologies in warfare.

We must refuse to choose between empathizing with either Palestinians or Israelis; or showing compassion for either Gazans or Israeli hostages and their families.

Instead, we must recognize – and reflect in our words and actions – that Palestinians and Israelis share a long and profound experience of grief and loss.

That they are equally deserving of a peaceful and secure future.

I urge you to help realize this future through principled multilateral action and a genuine commitment to peace.

Thank you.

 

Background Information: 

UNRWA is the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East. The United Nations General Assembly established UNRWA in 1949 with a mandate to provide humanitarian assistance and protection to registered Palestine refugees in the Agency’s area of operations pending a just and lasting solution to their plight.

UNRWA operates in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, The Gaza Strip, Jordan, Lebanon and Syria. 

Tens of thousands of Palestine refugees who lost their homes and livelihoods due to the 1948 conflict continue to be displaced and in need of support, nearly 75 years on.

UNRWA helps Palestine Refugees achieve their full potential in human development through quality services it provides in education, health care, relief and social services, protection, camp infrastructure and improvement, microfinance, and emergency assistance. UNRWA is funded almost entirely by voluntary contributions.

Your support is crucial to help us provide emergency aid 
to displaced families in Gaza


-


16/04/2024

Arts and colonial history: Will France work on rendering looted artefacts?

 



'Titanic' Task Of Finding Plundered African Art In French Museums



During a visit to Burkina Faso in 2017, French President Emmanuel Macron pledged to return "African heritage to Africa" within five years, pushing other former colonial powers, including Belgium and Germany, to launch similar initiatives.

In 2021, France repatriated 26 royal treasures its soldiers took from Benin during colonial rule.

The effort has stalled, and in March the government indefinitely postponed a bill authorising the return of African and other cultural artefacts following right-wing resistance in the Senate.

French museums are nonetheless studying the origins of some 90,000 African objects in their archives.

With tens of thousands of African artworks in French museums, curators face a huge task in trying to identify which of these were plundered during colonial rule in the 19th and 20th centuries and should be returned.

Most -- 79,000 -- are in the Quai Branly museum in Paris dedicated to indigenous art from Africa, Asia, Oceania and the Americas.

The task is "titanic and exhilarating", said Emilie Salaberry, head of the Angoulême Museum, which houses around 5,000 African objects.

"It's turned upside down how we understand our collections," she told AFP.

Identifying an object's provenance is becoming central to museum work, but tracking down the necessary information is hard and time-consuming.

France's Army Museum began its inventory in 2012 but has only been able to study around a quarter of its 2,248 African pieces.

And while it says there is a "reasonable hypothesis" that many are spoils of war, it has struggled to establish definitive conclusions.

"The main difficulty... is the relative lack of sources," a museum spokesperson told AFP.

Emilie Giraud, president of ICOM France, which oversees 600 museums, said: "It's real investigative work which requires cross-checking clues and finding sources that may be scattered, sometimes abroad, or might not even exist at all."

It is hoped the task will grow easier as this type of research becomes commonplace.

The University of Paris-Nanterre introduced a course dedicated to provenance in 2022, and the Louvre School at the heart of the famed museum followed suit in 2023.

Germany and France launched a three-year, 2.1-million-euro ($2.2 million) fund for provenance research in January.

"We need to be transparent about everything, including the inadequacies of our catalogues, our dating, and our designations," said Katia Kukawka, chief curator of the Aquitaine Museum, calling the job an "ethical imperative".

To ease the cost burden, the Aquitaine Museum, which has 2,500 African objects, is pooling resources with other organisations, including museums in Gabon and Cameroon.

But without the proposed law, it remains uncertain what criteria will determine when an object must be returned to Africa.

If it was illegally acquired, that might be sufficient, said Salaberry, of the Angouleme Museum, but the lack of clear historical records will continue to frustrate restitution efforts.

"There will be an enormous number of objects for which light can never be shed," she said.

Loans and long-term retainers could be an alternative to full restitution -- as Britain recently did for items from the Ashanti, or Asante, royal court in Ghana.

But not everyone was impressed with that.

As Nana Oforiatta Ayim, a culture adviser to Ghana's government, told the BBC: "Someone comes into your home and steals something, keeps it in their house, and then X amount of years later comes up and says 'I'm going to lend you your things back'. It doesn't make any sense."

(AFP)